Mendeley
TY  _  JOUR
ID  -  139505181020383065
TI  -  A Critical Review of Implicit Metaphor in Rhetorical Works
JO  -  Pazhūhish-i Źabān  va Adabiyyāt-i Farsī
JA  -  ES
LA  -  fa
SN  -  1735-1030
AU  -   
AU  -  Ziari Keramatollah
AU  -  pourahmad Ahmad
AU  -   
AU  -   
AD  -  دانشیار گروه زبان و ادبيات فارسي دانشگاه قم 
AD  -  دانشگاه تهران
AD  -  
AD  -  NULL
AD  -  
Y1  -  2025
PY  -  2025
VL  -  45
IS  -  
SP  -  1
EP  -  10
KW  -  Reviews 
KW  -   criticism 
KW  -   Implicit Metaphor 
KW  -   Rhetorical Works
DO  -  
N2  -  <p>One of the most debatable types of metaphor is perhaps the implicit metaphor. This &lrm;type of metaphor cannot be found in the early rhetorical works. It was the great &lrm;scholar, Jurjani, who dealt with this metaphorical structure, yet he has not men-&lrm;tioned any name for it. Once a name was coined for this term, disputes over its &lrm;authenticity also began. Some researchers refrained to recognize it as a metaphor, &lrm;some described it as implicit simile and some just repeated others' views. In recent &lrm;times some researchers, by suggesting it as a kind of personification, have tried o &lrm;solve the problem; however, they have finally admitted that the implicit metaphor is &lrm;broader and more inclusive than personification.&lrm; In this paper, in addition to reviewing and analyzing this term chronologically in &lrm;rhetorical works,we have shown that rhetorics researchers have paid more atten-&lrm;tion to the definition of metaphor and have focused on the implicit metaphor in &lrm;terms of terminology; they have considered it from the lexical aspect, while based &lrm;on the definition of Sakkaki and other rhetoricians, "metaphoricity" of this structure &lrm;is acceptable, however we can not accept constraints such as &ldquo;imaginative". It can &lrm;also regard personification, subordinate metaphor , animism as branches of the &lrm;implicit metaphor, not it's alternatives.&lrm;</p>
UR  - rimag.ir/en/Article/10303
L1  - rimag.ir/en/Article/Download/10303
ER  -  
