Mendeley
TY  _  JOUR
ID  -  13990309237481
TI  -  OmoureHasbieh  in beliet geometiy of shia jurisprudence
JO  -  Theological – Doctrinal Research (Islamic Azad University-Saveh Branch)
JA  -  ES
LA  -  fa
SN  -  9899-1735
AU  -    Panjehpour Javad  
AU  -  baharloei siyamak
AD  -  دانشگاه آزاد اصفهان
AD  -  خوراسگان اصفهان
Y1  -  2020
PY  -  2020
VL  -  2
IS  -  
SP  -  137
EP  -  158
KW  -  Enjoining good and forbidding wrong
KW  -    Public welfare
KW  -    Public works
KW  -   Sheriff
DO  -  
N2  -  The subject of public welfare and public works are important issues among Muslim philosophers such as Shi'a and Sunni. On the one hand, this issue, similar to some other issues in governmental jurisprudence, has partly been influenced by verbal differences between Sunnis and Shi'as. Accordingly, the Sunni people had paid more attention to the public aspect of public affairs due to the acceptance of caliphate sovereignty, but Shiite jurisprudents had often considered most non-governmental aspects of public affairs. The proper unity and appropriate consensus between the jurists (in their foundations and approaches to the public welfare and public works) in the expansion and limitation of the extent of the implementation of these divine commandments are not observed (although there is a consensus in the sense of affairs). This discrepancy indicates that each of them has different foundations and approaches compared to public welfare. According to the above descriptions, there are two theories and views on the excerpts of the public works. The first view is that the domain of this institution is limited to the guardianship of the estate of the orphans, insane people, and bankrupt orphans. The second view does not limit the scope of public works to specific issues and has a wider perspective than the first view, which also includes social, economic, political, and cultural issues. Even though the public works are one of the vague issues in legal affairs, legislators have not considered a comprehensive definition of it and have not provided an effective criterion for identifying it. Therefore, the main objective of this research is the comparative study of public works for the jurisprudence of Shia and Sunni jurisprudence' views by the codified statue. Also, the findings of this research show that the scope of public works in the Sunni jurisprudence is limited to the issue of Enjoining good and forbidding wrong, but for the Shiite jurisprudents, it covers everything that leads to the disorder in a social system and the fault in society. Thus, the concept of public works is beyond enjoining good and forbidding wrong.
UR  - rimag.ir/en/Article/19361
L1  - rimag.ir/en/Article/Download/19361
ER  -  
