Mendeley
TY  _  JOUR
ID  -  1400090132334
TI  -  Critique of the components of jurisprudential management
JO  -  Theological – Doctrinal Research (Islamic Azad University-Saveh Branch)
JA  -  ES
LA  -  fa
SN  -  9899-1735
AU  -   
AU  -   
AU  -   
AD  -  دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی واحد فسا
AD  -  دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی واحد فسا
AD  -  ادبیات فصا 
AD  -  دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي، قم
AD  -  استاد علوم سیاسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد قم
AD  -  دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قم
Y1  -  2021
PY  -  2021
VL  -  4
IS  -  
SP  -  199
EP  -  226
KW  -  
DO  -  
N2  -  Dr. Soroush is one of the theorists of the contemporary period who has raised several problems from the impossibility and contradiction of jurisprudential management to the pests of the operation of such management. He states that the main goal of religion is the Hereafter and accordingly does not consider religion to have a plan for the affairs of the world, especially the government and the general management of society. Of course, jurisprudence as a part of religion has social rules related to the world, but Dr. Soroush, stating that firstly the work of jurisprudence is only to express the ruling and not planning and management and secondly the rules of minority jurisprudence are limited to eliminating hostilities and worship. , Does not consider this part of religion, like the whole religion, to be useful for managing worldly affairs. On the other hand, he considers this worldliness to be one of the shortcomings of jurisprudence in the management of the religious community and does not necessarily consider the government and the jurisprudential community to be religious and moral. He has concluded from the worldliness, the purpose of the transcendence and minority of jurisprudence, the transcendence and continuity of jurisprudence, then they consider the permanent knowledge of jurisprudence due to being based on secret materials as another plague of jurisprudential rule in addition to the principle The fact that jurisprudence is based on secret materials also causes the inefficiency of jurisprudence in society. He also considers the central task of jurisprudence to be contrary to human rights and does not consider the task-oriented jurisprudential government to be democratic.
The present research, due to the necessity of answering such doubts and problems, explains and criticizes their opinions in a rational and philosophical way.

UR  - rimag.ir/en/Article/32334
L1  - rimag.ir/en/Article/Download/32334
ER  -  
