Mendeley
TY  _  JOUR
ID  -  1401051138770
TI  -  A Critique of the Theory of the End of Comparative Philosophy Based on Steven Burik’s View
JO  -  History of Philasophy
JA  -  ES
LA  -  fa
SN  -  2008-9589
AU  -  Parvizi Maryam
AU  -  Pourhasan Ghasem
AD  -  
AD  -  دانشیار فلسفه دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
Y1  -  2023
PY  -  2023
VL  -  1
IS  -  
SP  -  111
EP  -  134
KW  -  comparative philosophy
KW  -   end
KW  -   essential impossibility
KW  -   Europe-centeredness
KW  -   inter-cultural philosophy
KW  -   Heidegger
KW  -   Steven Burik
DO  -  
N2  -  Since the coinage of the term “comparative philosophy” several views have been propounded concerning its whatness, principles, and function. Some thinkers emphasize the end of comparative philosophy, and some others insist on its significance and necessity. There are still others who advocate the beginning of some basic changes in this school from Europe-centeredness to interaction and dialog with others. However, the word “end” has different meanings the investigation of which could lead to three main meanings and referents for it: 1) essential impossibility: the followers of this theory believe that comparative philosophy suffers from an important defect called “impossibility in essence” because of its internal problems and shortages and should not have been formed at all; 2) appearance of all possibilities and actualization of all potencies and abilities, which emphasizes the principle of progress and perfection; 3) end of the past and a new beginning. Following an analytic-descriptive method and relying on Steven Burik’s viewpoint, the present study investigates and evaluates the theory of the end of comparative philosophy based on these three meanings. Apparently, what opponents of comparative philosophy emphasize is end in the first sense because they believe that this kind of philosophy has become “Europe-centered” and cannot enter any dialog or interaction with other scientific traditions and systems. Accordingly, it conceptually enjoys a kind of essential impossibility. Nevertheless, unlike the opponents, Burik believes that comparative philosophy is necessary for stopping the East’s isolation and the growth of Europe-centeredness. Through adopting a critical approach to the “previous comparative philosophy” because of its Europe-centeredness, he pays attention to the “future comparative philosophy”, which bears two responsibilities: 1) maintaining various methods of thinking and 2) facilitating the relationship between these methods without reducing one to another.
UR  - rimag.ir/en/Article/38770
L1  - rimag.ir/en/Article/Download/38770
ER  -  
