Mendeley
TY  _  JOUR
ID  -  1401071639592
TI  -  Mullā Ṣadrā’s Defense of two Dialetheic Challenges in the Trans-Substantial Motion
JO  -  Kheradname-ye sadra
JA  -  ES
LA  -  fa
SN  -  1560-0874
AU  -  HashemiFar GholamAli
AU  -  Azimi Mahdi 
AD  -  وزارت علوم
AD  -  دانشگاه تهران 
Y1  -  2023
PY  -  2023
VL  -  1
IS  -  
SP  -  113
EP  -  128
KW  -  trans-substantial motion
KW  -   identity
KW  -   ambiguity
KW  -   dialetheism
KW  -   Mullā Ṣadrā
DO  -  
N2  -  Although the problem of motion has created various challenges in the history of philosophy by itself, the trans-substantial motion as the turning point of the Transcendent philosophy is prone to some additional challenges that can be followed in the manifest of dialetheism. One of these challenges is the loss of the identity of subject in the context of motion and, following this, the realization of borderline-states and the appearance of a paradox known as the problem of ambiguity in philosophical literature. Such debates themselves lead to paradoxes that contemporary dialetheists consider as evidence for the existence of contradiction in the outside world. The manifestation of such challenges and their relationship with the trans-substantial motion is the focal problem of the present paper. Since any change in archetypal forms in the cradle of trans-substantial motion is of the gradual and continuous type rather than the sudden type, the absence of a borderline at various stages of motion paves the way for the truth of two different quiddities at the same time for one subject, which necessitates contradiction by itself. Following a critical descriptive analytic method, this study reveals that Mullā Ṣadrā has responded to both challenges. He has answered the identity challenge based on the idea of “matter with form” and referred the challenge of ambiguity to our perception’s negligence in matching quiddity to all modes of being.
UR  - rimag.ir/en/Article/39592
L1  - rimag.ir/en/Article/Download/39592
ER  -  
