Mendeley
TY  _  JOUR
ID  -  1402021642147
TI  -  Presenting a Method for Agile Enterprise Architecture Modeling
JO  -  Journal of Information and Communication Technology
JA  -  ES
LA  -  fa
SN  -  2717-0411
AU  -  Razi Ali
AU  -   
AU  -  Yazdanpanah Ahmad Ali
AD  -  دانشجوی رشته مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، گروه مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
AD  -  گروه کامپیوتر، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، واحد ساوه 
AD  -  استادیار
Y1  -  2024
PY  -  2024
VL  -  61
IS  -  
SP  -  85
EP  -  108
KW  -  Decision Model and Notation
KW  -   Modeling Standards
KW  -   Business Architecture Modeling
KW  -   Agile Enterprise Architecture Modeling
KW  -   Evaluating the Applicability and Simplicity.
DO  -  
N2  -  <p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-font-family: Nazanin; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: FA;">One of the important issues and concerns in agile enterprise architecture is the documenting and modeling of requirements and artifacts. Architectural models and documents should be produced and updated as necessary and while meeting the requirements and concerns of the stakeholders, they should be presented in the shortest time and at the lowest cost. On the other hand, methods and tools should be used that are applicable and simple, and while using agile practices and modeling standards, have the necessary comprehensiveness. Researches has been done regarding the modeling and documenting of agile enterprise architecture. Since there is no comprehensive, standard and minimal method for modeling and documenting agile enterprise architecture in related researches, therefore, in this paper, a method for modeling agile enterprise architecture is presented and evaluated by the combined (qualitative + quantitative) method. Qualitative evaluation is performed through a case study. For quantitative evaluation, the AHP method is used to weighting and ranking the criteria. Evaluation criteria are extracted based on library studies and experts' opinions. In order to quantitatively evaluate the proposed method, six criteria have been proposed in this paper, which are: production of required and necessary artifacts, reduction of modeling time, reduction of cost, improvement of stakeholders satisfaction, improvement of applicability and increase of simplicity, and criteria of production of required and necessary artifacts, has won the highest rank.</span></p>
UR  - rimag.ir/en/Article/42147
L1  - rimag.ir/en/Article/Download/42147
ER  -  
